Torn Between Two Lovers?

>two lovers, he can only be ‘enjoying' two
Torn Between Two Lovers?lovers, ‘fooling' with two lovers,
Torn between two lovers/‘misleading' two lovers, ‘cheating' two
Acting Like a Fool/lovers and ‘abusing' the love of two lovers.
Loving both of you/Why? Because a man initiates the bond of love ( I am
Is breaking all the rules.not discussing dating or flirtation or seduction here). If a
When Mary Macgregor sang that in the 70s, 2 millionman goes out of his way to lead on Ms X today and
people bought the single. Who do you think thoseagain to lead on Ms. Z tomorrow, he is a
were? I would say teenagers.. you say women?PHILANDERER. This is the behaviour of a playboy, not
Probably men.. men over forty to be precise . To bea Romeo. You can have feelings for two people; but
torn between two lovers literally means both areyou can not be in love with two people and should
attracting you in opposite directions. Loving both ofnever pretend to be. We all had vague glimpses of
them means you love both, but are in love with none.such experiences during our early teenage. Once, we
You like both and just cannot make up your mind as togrew up, we knew that such feelings are not love but
which one is ‘better'. In her song, Mary saysadmiration. When you admire two people, the scales
she has a place in her heart that only Mr. X can fill; yet,will have to tip on one side eventually; so even then,
the place she gave Mr. Z is his still.. This is gettingthere is a choice to be made.
confusing. Ok, let me inspect with you theBeing torn is a momentary state, where one is begging
psychological make up of a woman in love. All womento have all his options laid on the table without
know that a woman loves a man for his love for her.disturbance, so that he/she could have all the time in
Of course, she could be attracted to someone whothe world to make an informed decision. This is not
does not even know her name; but deep down, whatlove. It has little to do with love. Here, we are discussing
makes her love a man is his (true) love for her. Now,who is ‘better'; who is ‘more suitable' for
suppose two people are in love with a woman, wouldme. Not ‘ whom I am in love with'.
not she feel torn between both of them as to whomTo be torn between two lovers, is to have two
she should end up with? It is getting reasonable now.overlapping affairs where none is more important than
So she loves two persons.. we all can love a dozenthe other. If it is a man, there is no ‘other
simultaneously; yet, we can only be in love with onewoman' here. In fact, the two women are
person at a time. What Mary is really saying is I love‘other' women. Just like Sherayar, this man is
both of you, cannot decide which one I want; soenjoying the variety supplied. Shehreyar was not in
please let me keep both of you (until I make up mylove before Shehrezad. When she came, she became
mind).the only one. Next time, you hear a gentleman claiming
Because a woman loves on receiving signals from theto be torn between two lovers, please poke his two
man involved that he loves her, the situation iseyes for me!
understood. But when it is a man who is torn between